Friday, February 10, 2017

Travel Chaotically! - New York and FABRIC shopping!!!


B spoiled me by spending his first full day in the Big Apple hot footing it to the Fabric/Garment district.  (He does love to take abstract colorful pics no matter where he goes...so I don't think it was too dull for him!!!)




Ya gotta go Me-MADE when fabric shopping!!!




The BEST bagels...PERIOD!!!...really ARE at BEST Bagel and Coffee on 35th St.!!!  A teeny tiny linear shop with practically no seating....but sooooo worth it!!!


Yumminess!

More sparkly, spandexy fabrics than one could possibly imagine!!





You know. Just your basic street scene with a skate boarder, pedestrians, a man blowing bubbles and a fire engine.  

The Mother Ship!  I mean......MOOD!
I posted this video before....but it really does capture the chaos very well:  Mood in motion!!!


Seriously, is this not a wonderland?!

And you gotta meet Swatch!!!



Then....there were OTHER stores!  This one sold (and made) just ZIPPERS!!!!

Finding Metro Textiles, leaving B to deal with the somewhat crotchety and exuberant Kashi!!


Someone with a serious love of orange...or a VOLs fan?????

B and J!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  When you love ALL the fabric!!!
So organized.  So well labelled!!!

Well, maybe not LOVE for ALL the fabrics!



Style is style.  Fashion is fashion.  GIRL!  You got STYLE! (Style definitely detached from content!!!)

Happy shopping.....

...and shipping!!!





With a delicious, seriously thin crust pizza from Vezzo's for dinner!!!  Great tip, J!!!
Soooooo much fun!  Thanks, B! - c

Thursday, February 9, 2017

Travel Chaotically! - New York - it begins.....


As I mentioned a few months ago, Brent and I were blessed to enjoy an amazing trip in September that took us to New York, with visits to an amazing city and dear friends, to Paris, Bordeaux, Arcachon, Sarlat, Marseille, and back to Paris again!  Here's the beginning.....

Once in New York we proceeded to ride EVERY train!!!  From the Jamaica Air Train in from the airport, catching the 6 to Grand Central, the Harlem Metro Line to Wassaic and back again....then the metro all around!!!  IT. WAS. AWESOME!
Getting to play with good friends (some pictured, some not!) was a fabulous treat!!!! [Love you bunches S and S and J and F!!!!]


Back in the Big Apple we were good to go in Pod 39!!!  We got this bunkie business down!!!

Dinner at The Smith, per Ruthie's recommendation and what a great place!!!



Mushrooms and rice with amazing Asian flavors topped with a perfectly fried egg.
Pulpo for B...


Burrata with toast for me!

Our street!






My two favorite pics from MOMA....yes...both in the courtyard, taken by Bentie.  A little Black and White Warbler and a Common Yellow Warbler (per our Google research!).  Dull names for super cute little birdies!


Lovely combo's of old and new throughout the city.  Lots of helpful and "interesting" folks. Like the girl who let us into MOMA on 'student' tickets as we only had about an hour before close.  There was the fellow having a huge fist-a-cuffs with an imaginary (or maybe just invisible to me!!!) combatant in Grand Central.  He seemed to have gotten the better of the fellow, though.  For which many of us in the area were glad!   We were sweetly shepherded on the train by a lovely gent, folks often helped out as we looked at our map and were just good people generally!!!  It was all lovely!  More to come....   les

Tuesday, February 7, 2017

Eosinophilia - biomarker for prognosis in melanoma and importance in immunotherapy response


I've posted data about eosinophil counts as markers in melanoma before ~

Here in 2016:  Blood markers associated with clinical outcome of melanoma treated with ipi

Here in August of 2015:  Markers for response to immunotherapy: Increased eosinophils = good. Increased Myeloid Suppressor cells = not so good.

Here in June of 2015, with a graph of my own esosinophils while in my trial:  ASCO 2015: Eosinophilia with Nivo and Pembro - A predictor of success?!!

Eosinophilic count as a biomarker for prognosis of melanoma patients and its importance in the response to immunotherapy. Moreira, Lesigana, Schuler, Heinzerling. Immunotherapy. 2017 Jan.

The prognostic role of eosinophils in cancer has been controversial. Some entities such as gastrointestinal cancers show a better survival, while others such as Hodgkin's lymphoma a worse survival in patients with eosinophilia. Patients who exhibited an increase in eosinophils upon therapy with ipilimumab or pembrolizumab were shown to survive longer. We wanted to investigate whether eosinophilia is a prognostic marker in metastatic melanoma.

In total, 173 patients with metastatic melanoma from our data base (median age 60 years; n = 86 with immunotherapy, n = 87 without immunotherapy) were analyzed for eosinophil counts and survival over the course of 12 years. Eosinophilic count was detected by peripheral blood smear. The ethical committee had approved this retrospective study.

Melanoma patients with eosinophilia at any point in their course of disease show a trend toward longer survival independently of their therapy. There is a statistically significant difference for the patients who survive at least 12 months. In patients with checkpoint inhibitor therapy, survival was significantly prolonged in every patient with eosinophilia. Furthermore, 69% of the patients treated with immunotherapy experienced at least once an eosinophilia of 5% or greater compared with 46% in the immunotherapy naive-group; for an eosinophilia of 10% values were 30 and 9%, respectively. Interestingly, in patients with more than 20% eosinophils (n = 7) survival was prolonged with a median of 35 months (range 19-60 months) as compared with 16 months (range 1-117 months).


Eosinophilia is a prognostic marker in patients with metastatic melanoma.

It is looking more and more as though increased esosinophils indicate an improved prognosis for melanoma patients.  Hopefully, this finding will soon materialize in a methodology for making better treatment choices or to attain eosinophilia (if that is what we need to do) in order to create better outcomes....rather than just interesting incidental data.  Clearly, there is much we do not understand when it comes to our immune systems!! - c

Saturday, February 4, 2017

Sew Chaotically! - Faux wrap dress in a lovely textured knit - M6884


Ruthie gave me some beautiful knit pieces for my 50th birthday.  Here's how I used them:

M6886, T shirt dress
Morris Blazer

M6752

Having a Ruthie is awesome!!!  AND...
I still had one beautiful piece that, until recently, I hadn't been brave enough to cut into.  But finally....I decided that despite some less than stellar reviews....this pattern would be perfect...

So cut into it I did!  I used the remnants for the sleeves on my Linden here:


Then, I made this:
It is a faux wrap dress criticized for:  too deep a V neck combined with too short a skirt and tie placement too close to the bust with ties that were too short.  Forewarned is forearmed!  I lengthened the skirt by a couple of inches and placed the ties at my true waist after lengthening them by a couple of inches.  (Though should I make this dress again, I may leave them off completely!)  After careful checking, I decided the neckline was okay.

Sad Mannie bootie!









Have to say, I am pretty pleased with how it turned out!!  Thanks, Ruthie!!! Not only for the beautiful fabric, but for all your love, laughs and encouragement!!!  - love, cess

Thursday, February 2, 2017

For Stage II/III melanoma patients: Interferon NO BETTER than observation!!!!


Since 2010, the beginning of this blog, I have been YELLING that interferon provides little to no help in stopping the progression of melanoma and NO effect on overall survival at all!!! (That's from the real live DATA people!)  It WILL, however, make you extremely ill! The problem has always been the presence of anecdotal "evidence" and the desire of folks to believe.  We've all heard this story, "Well, I'm Stage III and I took interferon and MY melanoma hasn't recurred!"  In melanoma world, when ANYONE fails to recur, that is WONDERFUL news!!!  However, these stories were never proof that interferon had ANYTHING to do with failure to progress.  Research has been lacking because, with no effective drugs for use as adjuvant, no one was really paying attention, AND - many folks with Stage II/III melanoma never progress even with no treatment!!!  Now there's this.....

Phase III Randomized Study of 4 Weeks of High-Dose Interferon-α-2b in Stage T2bNO, T3a-bNO, T4a-bNO, and T1-4N1a-2a (microscopic) Melanoma: A Trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Cancer Research Group (E1697). Agarwala, Lee...Sosman, Flaherty, Sondak, ….Kirkwood. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 30.

Purpose: To test the efficacy of 4 weeks of intravenous (IV) induction with high-dose interferon (IFN) as part of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group regimen compared with observation (OBS) in patients with surgically resected intermediate-risk melanoma.

Patients and Methods: In this intergroup international trial, eligible patients had surgically resected cutaneous melanoma in the following categories: (1) T2bN0, (2) T3a-bN0, (3) T4a-bN0, and (4) T1-4N1a-2a (microscopic). Patients were randomly assigned to receive IFN α-2b at 20 MU/m2/d IV for 5 days (Monday to Friday) every week for 4 weeks (IFN) or OBS. Stratification factors were pathologic lymph node status, lymph node staging procedure, Breslow depth, ulceration of the primary lesion, and disease stage. The primary end point was relapse-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, toxicity, and quality of life.

Results: A total of 1,150 patients were randomly assigned. At a median follow-up of 7 years, the 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 0.70 for OBS and 0.70 for IFN. The 5-year overall survival rate was 0.83 for OBS and 0.83 for IFN. Treatment-related grade 3 and higher toxicity was 4.6% versus 57.9% for OBS and IFN, respectively. Quality of life was worse for the treated group.

Conclusion: Four weeks of IV induction as part of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group high-dose IFN regimen is not better than OBS alone for patients with intermediate-risk melanoma as defined in this trial.


The results speak loud and clear!  Interferon is no better than observation alone!!!! However, there will certainly be those who say, "Yeah, well.  These folks only took it for 4 weeks. I took it for a year!!"  The facts remain:  All previous studies of interferon in melanoma (even when administered for a full year) have shown no change in overall survival for anyone and only in patients with ulcerated lesions was there the slightest benefit in progression free survival.  HOWEVER, now that ipi and anti-PD-1 are available, with far better outcomes than any ever delivered with interferon, I see NO REASON for anyone in need of adjuvant melanoma treatment to be relegated to this inhumane option.  Agarwala, Sondak, Flaherty and the King of all things interferon: Kirkwood ~ PLEASE!  Read and comprehend your own data!!! Work toward making anti-PD-1 available for your early Stage melanoma patients who desire treatment, rather than continuing to beat this dead horse!

Ok. Rant over.  I guess. - c

Wednesday, February 1, 2017

What the Melanoma Big Dogs are working on in 2017!!!


Immunotherapy!  Targeted therapy!  TIL!  CARs!  Intratumoral therapies!  Here we go!!!!

Novel Checkpoints and Cosignaling Molecules in Cancer Immunotherapy.  Giuroiu, Weber. Cancer J. 2017 Jan/Feb.
The recent demonstration of the antitumor efficacy of checkpoint protein inhibition has resulted in the approval of blocking antibodies against the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway in multiple different histologic findings. Therapeutic successes with PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in melanoma and lung cancer have been followed by approvals in bladder, renal, and head and neck cancers and Hodgkin lymphoma, with others undoubtedly to come. However, PD-1 is only one of many checkpoints and agonistic regulatory molecules expressed on T cells by which maintenance of the balance between costimulatory and coinhibitory signaling pathways is perturbed in cancer. The manipulation of many of these molecules in cancer patients might be associated with clinical benefit. The majority of the T-cell cosignaling receptors belong to either the immunoglobulin superfamily or the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily. A total of 29 immunoglobulin superfamily and 26 tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily cosignaling receptors have been identified that are expressed on T cells, providing fertile ground for development of inhibitory or agonistic antibodies and small molecules as cancer therapeutics. In the current work, we focus on some of the most promising new checkpoints and agonistic or cosignaling molecules that are in early clinical development as single agents or in combinations with PD-1/PD-L1, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 blockade, or chemotherapy with an emphasis on those that have reached the clinic and on important targets that are in late preclinical development.

Novel Targeted Therapies for Metastatic Melanoma.  Iams, Sosman, Chandra.  Cancer J.  2017 Jan/Feb.

Oncogene-targeted therapy is a major component of precision oncology, and although patients with metastatic melanoma have experienced improved outcomes with this strategy, there are a number of potential therapeutic targets currently under study that may further increase the drug armamentarium for this patient population. In this review, we discuss the landscape of targeted therapies for patients with advanced melanoma, focusing on oncogene mutation-specific targets. In patients with typical BRAF V600-mutant melanoma, combination BRAF and MEK inhibition has surpassed outcomes compared with monotherapy with BRAF or MEK inhibition alone, and current strategies seek to address inevitable resistance mechanisms. For patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma, MEK inhibitor monotherapy and combined MEK and CDK4/6 inhibition are burgeoning strategies; for patients with KIT-mutant melanoma, tyrosine kinase inhibition is being leveraged, and for NF-1-mutant melanoma, mTOR and MEK inhibition is being actively evaluated. In patients with atypical, non-V600 BRAF-mutant melanoma, MEK inhibitor monotherapy is the potential novel targeted approach on the horizon. For advanced uveal melanoma, novel targets such as IMCgp100 and glembatumumab have shown activity in early studies. We review additional strategies that remain in the preclinical and early clinical pipeline, so there is much hope for the future of targeted agents for distinct molecular cohorts of patients with advanced melanoma.

Adoptive Cell Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma.  Merhavi-Shoham, Itzhaki, Markel, et al. Cancer J. 2017 Jan/Feb.  

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is a powerful form of immunotherapy by inducing durable complete responses that significantly extend the survival of melanoma patients. Mutation-derived neoantigens were recently identified as key factors for tumor recognition and rejection by TILs. The isolation of T-cell receptor (TCR) genes directed against neoantigens and their retransduction into peripheral T cells may provide a new form of ACT.  Genetic modifications of T cells with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) have demonstrated remarkable clinical results in hematologic malignancies, but are so far less effective in solid tumors. Only very limited reports exist in melanoma. Progress in CAR T-cell engineering, including neutralization of inhibitory signals or additional safety switches, may open opportunities also in melanoma.We review clinical results and latest developments of adoptive therapies with TILs, T-cell receptor, and CAR-modified T cells and discuss future directions for the treatment of melanoma.

Intratumoral Approaches for the Treatment of Melanoma.  Bommareddy, Silk, Kaufman.  Cancer J. 2017 Jan/Feb.

There have been significant advances in the immunotherapy of melanoma over the last decade. The tumor microenvironment is now known to promote an immune-suppressive milieu that can block effective immune-mediated tumor rejection. Several novel strategies designed to overcome local immunosuppression hold promise for treatment of melanoma and other cancers. These approaches include oncolytic viruses, plasmid DNA delivery, Toll-like receptor agonists, inflammatory dyes, cytokines, checkpoint inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and host and pathogenic cell-based vectors. In addition, there are several novel methods for local drug delivery, including direct injection, image-guided, electroporation, and nanodelivery techniques under study. The approval of talimogene laherparepvec (Imlygic), an attenuated, recombinant oncolytic herpesvirus, for melanoma treatment is the first intratumoral agent to receive regulatory approval for the treatment of patients with melanoma. This review will focus on the rationale for intratumoral treatment in melanoma, describe the clinical and safety data for some of the agents in clinical development, and provide a perspective for future clinical investigation with intratumoral approaches. Melanoma has been a paradigm tumor for progress in targeted therapy and immunotherapy and will likely also be the tumor to establish the therapeutic role of intratumoral treatment for cancer.


Sounds good!  I like a multi-faceted approach.  Now!  Let's make it so!  Double time!!!! - c