In this time of neo-adjuvant treatment for melanoma, two concepts are at odds with previous melanoma treatment plans.
1. The response to therapy may be better by actually leaving the tumor in place.
2. The premise that by waiting on surgery, the treatment may decrease the size of the lesion (and thereby diminish the size/damage from said surgery) or perhaps evaporate the lesion altogether so that surgery is not needed at all. The impact of these new aspects of melanoma treatments makes decisions about surgery for melanoma even more complicated. Here are zillions of reports about neoadjuvant treatment: Neo-Adjuvant treatment for melanoma That said - there are plenty of good reasons to have surgery to remove your melanoma lesions. We know that, neo-adjuvant care aside, folks with the lowest tumor burden respond better. We know that sometimes, one lesion remains persistently present even if all other lesions resolve. Some patients will become NED after systemic treatment but later develop a lesion. There are folks who haven't responded well to systemic therapy may need radiation and surgery to tackle their lesions. The varied reasons for needing surgery are just as mixed as melanoma can be itself. Still, there is a significant body of evidence indicating the benefit of the adage - "When in doubt, cut it out!"
There is this from 2019 ~ Cut it out!!! Prolonged overall survival following metastasectomy in Stage IV melanoma
And this from 2020 ~ Surgical removal of melanoma lesions -
That said, there are these reports on varied circumstances that looked at surgery and melanoma patients:
Re-defining the role of surgery in the management of
patients with oligometastatic stage IV melanoma in the era of effective
systemic therapies. Ch’ng,
Uyulmaz, Carlino,…Long, Menzies. Eur J
Cancer. Aug 2021.
Although previously the mainstay of treatment, the role of
surgery in the management of patients with oligometastatic stage IV melanoma
has changed with the advent of effective systemic therapies (most notably
immunotherapy). Contemporary treatment options for patients with asymptomatic
solitary or oligo-metastases include upfront surgery followed by adjuvant
immunotherapy or upfront immunotherapy with salvage surgery as required. For
suspected solitary or oligo-metastases, surgery serves both diagnostic and
therapeutic purposes. Advances in radiological technology allow metastases to
be detected earlier and surgery to be less morbid. Surgical morbidities are
generally more tolerable than serious immune-related adverse effects, but
surgery may be less effective. Upfront immunotherapy ensures that futile
surgery is not offered for rapidly progressive disease. It also provides an
opportunity to assess response to treatment, which predicts outcome, and may
obviate the need for surgery. However, it is important not to miss a window of
opportunity for surgical intervention, whereby if disease progresses on
immunotherapy it becomes unresectable. In situations where local therapy is
recommended but surgery is not desired, stereotactic radiosurgery may be an
effective alternative. The decision-making process regarding upfront surgery
versus immunotherapy needs to take place within a specialist melanoma
multidisciplinary setting and be customized to individual patient and tumor
factors. Ultimately, high-level clinical trial evidence is required to resolve
uncertainties in the management of patients with oligometastatic stage IV
melanoma but the complexity of the varying presentations may make trial design
challenging.
Survival Outcomes of Salvage Metastasectomy After Failure
of Modern-Era Systemic Therapy for Melanoma. Li, Vakharia, Lo, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. Aug 2021.
Background: Metastasectomy for selected patients with
melanoma was associated with improved survival in the era before effective
systemic therapy. Emerging evidence shows that these benefits persist even in
this era of BRAF-targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor
immunotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of salvage
metastasectomy after failure of systemic therapy.
Methods: Stage 3 or 4 melanoma patients with extracranial
disease progression after at least 4 weeks of systemic treatment between 2009
and 2020 were identified and categorized as resected to no evidence of disease
(NED), non-progressive residual disease (NPRD), or progressive residual disease
(PRD). Systemic therapy was stratified into BRAF-targeted therapy, immune
checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy, or both. The end points of overall survival
(OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional disease control (LRC) were
assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression
procedures were used to examine factors associated with OS, PFS and LRC.
Results: The study enrolled 190 patients. Among all the
patients, the 5-year OS from metastatectomy was 52%, the 3-year PFS was 21%,
and the 5-year LRC was 61%. After resection to NED, NPRD, and PRD, the 5-year
OS values were 69%, 62% and 8%, respectively. Fewer lines of preoperative
therapy, use of preoperative immunotherapy, and resection to NED were predictors
of improved OS. After resection to NED, NPRD, and PRD, the 3-year PFS values
were 23%, 24% and 10%, and the 5-year LRC values were 61%, 72% and 34%,
respectively.
Conclusions: Salvage metastasectomy was associated with
durable survival and disease control, particularly after resection to NED,
preoperative immunotherapy, and fewer lines of preoperative systemic therapy
The role of local therapy in the treatment of solitary
melanoma progression on immune checkpoint inhibition: A multicentre
retrospective analysis. Versluis,
Hendriks , Weppler, et al.. Eur J
Cancer. 2021 Jul.
Introduction: In patients with metastatic melanoma,
progression of a single tumour lesion (solitary progression) after response to
immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is increasingly treated with local therapy.
We evaluated the role of local therapy for solitary progression in melanoma.
Patients and methods: Patients with metastatic melanoma
treated with ICI between 2010 and 2019 with solitary progression as first
progressive event were included from 17 centres in 9 countries. Follow-up and
survival are reported from ICI initiation.
Results: We identified 294 patients with solitary
progression after stable disease in 15%, partial response in 55% and complete
response in 30%. The median follow-up was 43 months; the median time to
solitary progression was 13 months, and the median time to subsequent
progression after treatment of solitary progression (TTSP) was 33 months. The
estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) was 79%; median OS was not reached.
Treatment consisted of systemic therapy (18%), local therapy (36%), both
combined (42%) or active surveillance (4%). In 44% of patients treated for
solitary progression, no subsequent progression occurred. For solitary
progression during ICI (n = 143), the median TTSP was 29 months. Both TTSP and
OS were similar for local therapy, ICI continuation and both combined. For
solitary progression post ICI (n = 151), the median TTSP was 35 months. TTSP
was higher for ICI recommencement plus local therapy than local therapy or ICI
recommencement alone, without OS differences.
Conclusion: Almost half of patients with melanoma treated
for solitary progression after initial response to ICI had no subsequent
progression. This study suggests that local therapy can benefit patients and is
associated with favourable long-term outcomes.
For what it's worth!! Hang tough. Melanoma is never easy, but there is hope. - c