Friday, April 18, 2014

Warriors Dashing!!!

At his sister's behest, Fred finds himself at the Warrior Dash in Dillard, GA!  Bright and early, with a nice chill in the air, that makes wearing a furry Viking Helmet desirable!!

Waiting on some sun!

Heading to the starting line.  Oh....and this is the competitive heat!  I mean, why not????!

And they're off!!!  Just a little 3 mile run with horrifying obstacles!  No biggie!

Loping Lopez gets gone!

Just a little in and out the tires....
And over dead cars....

Here comes, Roo!

She says cars are slippery after you swim over logs in a lake!
Yes.  That is indeed barbed wire over a muddy pit!

Fredo rounds the bend....number already gone...probably stuck to a log somewhere!!!

Too high to leap....

Under is the only option!

Doesn't that look fun?

He's off again!
Now for Rosie!

This race was one in which the participants were the best sports and most generous with one another that I have ever had the pleasure to observe.  Warriors indeed!!!

Gutting it out!

At least she's still got a good attitude!!!
There she goes!
Yep!  That is real live FIRE!!!

Check out those abs!

Leaping lizards!!!  Is she smiling????

That girl should have run hurdles!!  We just should have had them in flames!!!

After another dip in the lake and climb up a rope ladder...a little balance beam action over water!


Ready for splash down!!!

What a Merman!!!

Eyes on the prize!!!

Hugh Jackman better look out.....

WOLVERINE!!!!!!!!

DONE!

I'll take that medal now!!!

A little congratulations from the volunteers!
There's Roo....checking out the rope ladder!

Climbing up!

And up....

This is the exact technique....

She used to climb out of her crib before she could walk!!!

And down the other side!

"I've got to get over there???  And you took off the rope guides???!!!"

Time to scoot!

Oh my!

Inch by inch!!!

Bit by bit!!

Down the slide!!!

Bobbing to the surface!!!

Climbing out!

Heading to the finish!!!

And....

She's DONE!!!!
    
  The coolest (quite cold actually!!!) Warriors ever!!!  -  c

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Clinical Trials and Patient Rights...An oxymoron????

A conversation about clinical trials has been ongoing on one of the forums.  Much of the discussion has been from voices frustrated with their inability to find out which drug they were actually given when they leave a trial so that they can plan their next step against their disease. Others seek lab results hidden from view.  And there are the voices of convention...saying..."Oh, you should ask more questions...apply for this or that....read more carefully.  What did your papers really say?" Well, to that approach I say..."BULLOCKS!!!!"  The folks running these trials are fully CAPABLE of making themselves clear, in simple language, and providing answers to patients...IF THEY WANTED TO!!!!  I know some of you check both sites; I beg your indulgence.  But, I know many of you do not.  So...here's what I DID say:

As many of you know, I have been a rattie in a clinical trial since Dec 2010. I started caring for patients when I was 19 years old. I have seen this world from all sides. It is complicated, often painful and un-pretty. Despite all I have seen and learned....I am thankful. Thankful to have had the honor to serve my patients all these years and lucky to have gained participation in my trial. Ipi wasn't even on the market when I started. I had no other options.

Which brings me to perhaps the most important point of this whole discussion. No one participates in a clinical trial for fun. Ratties are only there because they are running off a sinking ship. And the researchers? Many are wonderful, compassionate people who want to use their lives and careers to do good things for others. But, think about it. Where is their allegiance? It is to the drug company and their institution first. That is who is funding at least some of the research. The institution provides their paycheck. The drug company wants to do great wonders with the drug (read: make big bucks!$!$). And, if the researcher/institution wants to do more fab research...they've got to make the trial work so that they can get additional opportunities to participate in the next break-through trial. Next, they must have an allegiance to science. There is greater commitment to the results of the experiment, than to you, the individual. It is not really the patient's well being calling the shots. The participation forms are very clear on all of this. They say: You may do great. You may acquire any of PAGES of side effects. We (the doc, the institution, and the drug company) CANNOT be held accountable if you grow three heads, turn purple, or croak. Additionally, we will not be held financially responsible for any costs related to care for any side effects or extra head amputation that you may later need. And....if your scans or labs or wayward body doesn't play right, you will be dropped from the trial. Oh, yes...you can quit when you want, but...then you're done.

So, all this brings reams of papers and confusing medical terminology to patients in desperate circumstances. Signing up for a clinical trial is not for the faint of heart. Nor is the information presented in terms that most folks understand...especially when feeling sick, worn, and worried. Rather, patients feel they are completely at the mercy of the doc, the drug company, and the trial. They are afraid they are going to die. They are not going to quibble. In Chapter 3, from Cancer Clinical Trials...by Robert Finn...he writes: "Cancer patients are in a one-down psychological position. They have to trust their doctor. They want a cure. They need a cure. They dare not risk any...alienation from the physician-researcher. So, they're very much inclined to do what the researcher wants and accede to the requests of the researchers."

I wrote my version here: http://chaoticallypreciselifeloveandmelanoma.blogspot.com/2012/02/educated-guesses-and-desperate.html

Bettin you are absolutely right. We need to make things consistent and better. There is no need for clinical trials to be so "random!" Yet, we ratties hope for good results for ourselves...and that even if we are not so lucky...then at least others will benefit from what is learned. WRONG again!!! In July of 2013, The Journal of Clinical Oncology published a review done of Phase II, III and IV cancer drug trials done between December 2007 and May 2010 and found that 50% of those results WERE NEVER PUBLISHED!!!!
My link: http://chaoticallypreciselifeloveandmelanoma.blogspot.com/2013/07/almost-50-of-results-of-cancer-drug.html

Brian, my tumors were tested, because of the express desire from BMS, for PDL1 as well. The wording of the additional consent form was purposefully vague. Explanations from the researcher, clinical trial coordinator, and everyone else involved, ranged from..."Oh my hands are tied to give you more intel"....to...."I don't know nuthin bout birthin' babies!"...to..."Hmmmm." And trust me, honey. I'm a patient who asks! Most do not. I've made rounds with untold numbers of doctors. Some are very happy to escape the room as quickly as possible. But, others are perfectly willing to sit and really try to answer any question. Yet....more often than not...patients just nod and smile. But, when I return to the room after the doctor is gone, the questions flow. Sorry...just an aside. But, my expectations for getting the results of my testing??? Pretty much...NONE! Here's my rant: http://chaoticallypreciselifeloveandmelanoma.blogspot.com/2012/09/info-on-test-for-pd-l1-and-availability.html

When I see trials that are still comparing new meds to ineffective ones like interferon and dacarbazine, I feel physically ill. It is wrong. It is abusive. In a conversation reported from the European Cancer Congress in 2013, Ribas said, "taking all the studies...comparing ipi and dacarbazine vs dacarbazine, ...vemurafenib vs dacarbazine, dabrafenib vs dacarbazine, and trametinib vs dacarbazine - all of these studies have shown that another treatment was better than our old standard."
Link: http://chaoticallypreciselifeloveandmelanoma.blogspot.com/2013/11/ipi-brafmek-anti-pd1-and-no-more.html

So what does all this mean and what can we do about it? It means that we still have a long way to go in attaining equal rights between drug companies, researchers, institutions and patients. I have no easy answers. All I can do is try to pay my fortunate circumstance forward, to make the path a little better, a little more comprehensible, for others. Some ratties squeak!!!

My best to you all. Celeste

Sunday, April 13, 2014

With melanoma: You can never be too rich or too thin! But, you can be too young!!!


Definitions to keep in mind:
Thickness (Breslow) - actual thickest part of a slice of the tumor...remembering that the lesion can rise above the level of your skin.
Clark level - a description of how deeply the tumor penetrated the layers of your skin.

Thin melanoma and late recurrences:  it is never too thin and never too late.  Richetta, et al.  Med Oncol.  April 2014.

"In the absence of risk factors, thin melanomas [generally defined as 1mm or less] present a long-term survival; however recurrences may occur....Median disease free survival of the entire cohort [in this study] was 26 months and three patients developed late metastases. Nine patients developed extra-nodal metastases as first recurrence, while cases of positive sentinel lymph node biopsy were not found....No consensus exists as to which patients with thin melanomas are at risk for metastases or late recurrences."

Sentinel node biopsy improves prognostic stratification in patients with thin melanomas and an additional risk factor.  Mitteldorf, et al. Ann Surg Oncol.  March 2014.

"Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with thin melanomas is not generally recognized as a clinical standard...931 patients had sentinel lymph node biopsies.  210 had thin melanomas.  Of the 210...All..showed at least one of the following risk factors:  ulceration (4%), Clark level IV (44%), nodular growth pattern (11%), mitoses (59%), regression (38%) or age </= 40 years (27%)."

....observed surprisingly high SLN positivity rate of 18%.  [Most of the literature says that for thin, 1mm or less, melanoma lesions the rate of finding a positive node is less than or equal to 5%.  Now, while that may sound nice....that is one of twenty people!!!]  "There was a trend towards a higher SLN positivity rate in younger patients. Breslow, ulceration, mitoses, nodular growth pattern, and sex did not reach significance.  Regression was significantly more frequently found in very thin melanomas (</=0.75mm) and tended to be significant in this subgroup."

"SLNB improves prognostic stratification in patients with thin melanomas having an additional risk factor....Our data suggest that SLNB should be offered to patients with thin melanomas, if ulceration, nodular growth pattern, mitoses or regression are present, or if the patient is younger than 40 years of age."

Identifying high risk patients with thin (</=1mm) primary cutaneous melanomas.  Gimotty et al. ASCO 2013. 

"The prognostic factors used to identify patients with thin melanomas at high risk of regional nodal metastasis or melanoma specific death include:  thicker tumors (>/= 0.75mm), deeper levels of invasion (Clark level IV or V), ulceration and dermal mitosis....Study cohort = 42, 080 patients with only one primary and no clinical evidence of metastasis at the time of diagnosis....Five year melanoma specific death rates were not uniform in 100 tumor thickness groups, but were stable in each of the following ranges:  4.3% - 0.01-0.17mm, 1.3% for 0.18-0.66mm, 3.1% for 0.65-1.00mm.  Among all patients, ulceration and level were the strongest prognostic factors.  Thickness was a weaker prognostic factor.  Four risk groups for regional nodal metastasis risk were identified:  
1) level IV/V (11.8%), 
2) level II/III with nodular or acral lentiginous histologies (15.1%),
3) level III and 0.11-0.17mm and not nodular or lentiginous (9.3%),
4) level III and 0.01-0.02mm and not nodular or letiginous (6%).
...Stratification schemes comparable to this will inform decision making."

My story:  Well, you can never be too rich if you are sick, in need of care longer than 2 minutes, or have to travel for your care!!!  Clearly, being thin (as applied to melanoma lesions) is not terribly protective.  I try not to say too much on the forums as Janner attempts to lull people out of their terror after having been diagnosed with an "atypical lesion"....she's definitely correct there.  No great risk, people.  It is gone.  Watch your skin.  Move on.  But, with this "thin melanoma" business...things can get murky!  Trust me!!!  My initial stats:  2003.  On right upper back.  Breslow measurement = 0.6mm.  Clark level IV.  No ulceration.  1/mitosis/hpf(high power field).  Yet, I had one positive node with "micrometastasis, Starz classification 1" (per Dr. Starz of Germany himself).  Later, we had a report from Martin Mimh, MD of Harvard, who noted that, yes, my tumor was a Clark Level IV (there had been some confusion on the part of the local 2-wong-fu pathologist) and "as you would expect" in such a case, I had a "positive node".  Age at diagnosis - 39.

As the thickness of the lesion was less than that indicated for a SNB at the time, we pushed for it anyway.  I am certain I would not be here today had I not had it done.  Turns out now, I WAS in a high risk group, despite the thinness of the lesion.  I was less than 40 years of age with a Clark level IV lesion. 

I don't want to frighten folks with this information.  But, this is the data.  And I am LIVING proof.
Take care of yourself.  Discuss with your melanoma specialist!  Yours, c

Friday, April 11, 2014

Happy thoughts!




See what angry, yellow T-cells can do to fat, ugly, pink blob cancer????  Go little T-cells!  GO! GO! GO!


Couldn't help but think of what Bentie might add when a nurse friend sent me this!!!  Pretty funny stuff!  Think of him and check the link below if you need a laugh....

B could probably add a few things... My life with a Nurse: A Man's Perspective



AND finally.....if life DOES give you lemons????

Make a Lemon Dress!!!

Much love and a happy Spring weekend to all! - c

Sunday, April 6, 2014

Background and latest info on anti-PD1 for melanoma

With the publicity of Merck's expanded access program (Hopefully they will actually TREAT a patient SOON!) for their anti-PD1 product, and the buzz around anti-PD1 generally...there have been many questions posed on the various forums about anti-PD1 lately.  Having had anti-PD1 (in the form of Nivolumab, BMS' product) as an ever present part of my world since December of 2010, I forget some folks don't know what it does and how.  I even looked back on my blog, and realized I hadn't posted many of the latest official results and info...so...here you go:

What is anti-PD1?  In the simplest possible terms:  Anti-PD1 drugs are antibodies that block the switch on white cells so that they can now attack melanoma cells.  Specifically, programmed death ligand-1 [PD-L1] is produced by the surface of melanoma tumors.  That ligand binds to the infiltrating T-cells, down-regulating them.  Basically, turning those cells "OFF" to melanoma.  ANTI-PD1 blocks that potential interaction, so that the T-cells can now attack melanoma cells.

How is it given?  In your vein through an IV or port.

At what dose?  They are still checking the results of various Nivolumab doses: 1, 3, or 10mg/kg.  I was given 1mg/kg.  If I had to guess, the FDA approved dose will probably be 3.  Positive effects against melanoma have been seen at all dosage levels.

What are the side effects?  
Rashes and Fatigue - very common.
Arthralgias - joint pain is frequently reported.  Inflammation triggered by the immune response does not make joints happy.
Mucositis - irritation of the mucus membranes, from redness and tenderness to pain and lesions.  (The gut is just one long tube that starts in the mouth after all....see Colitis below.)
Hypothyroidism - not as common, but certainly has happened.  Often treatable with thyroid hormone in pill form, synthroid.
Colitis - irritation and inflammation in the bowel that can cause diarrhea and bleeding.  Sometimes, causing dehydration and the need for hospitalization, fluids, discontinuation of the drug for a time or permanently, and at times prednisone to stop the progression.  This is a fairly common cause of patients being taken off ipi and anti-PD1.
Pneumonitis - significant inflammation in the lungs that may be treated as noted above and has even been a cause of death for patients on ipi and anti-PD1, and obviously removal from a trial or treatment.
Pituitary failure and vision problems related to the optic nerve, as well as retinitis, have occurred but are not reported as common events.
Vitiligo - the depigmentation of the skin (and/or hair), leaving white patches.  Thought to occur because of the shared antigens located on melanoma cells and normal pigment cells.  It is considered a good prognostic sign that the drug is working against melanoma and occurs in 5-9% of patients on ipi or anti-PD1.


Survival, Durable Tumor Remission, and Long-Term Safety in Patients with Advanced Melanoma Receiving Nivolumab  Topalian, Sznol, Sosman, Hodi, et al.  Journal Of Clinical Oncology.  March 3, 2014

107 patients with "advanced melanoma [out of 306 patients with various cancer types], enrolled between 2008 and 2012, received intravenous nivolumab in an outpatient setting every 2 weeks for up to 96 weeks and were observed for overall survival, long-term safety, and response duration after treatment discontinuation."
In the 107 melanoma patients:  Median survival was 16.8 months.  1 year survival = 62%.  2 year survival = 43%.  In 33 patients with objective tumor regression, estimated median response duration was 2 years.  Toxicities in all 306 patients were similar to those previously reported. 
Conclusion:  Overall survival following nivolumab treatment in patients with advanced treatment-refractory melanoma compares favorably with that in literature studies of similar patient populations.  Responses were durable and persisted after drug discontinuation.  Long-term safety was acceptable. 


NOTE: 
The above trial is the one that Dr. Weber was comparing the Moffitt trial results to on my last visit.  Link to the results we discussed:  discussion of my anti-PD1 trial results

The report below is from the sister arm, of NON-resected patients, from my anti-PD1 trial, though I am in the NED arm.  Also keep in mind, that when I started, folks who had been given ipi were not allowed in, but later arms were created that allowed patients who had failed ipi to participate.  Additionally, those of us originally enrolled in all arms were given vaccines, but since they were found to have no positive effect, later arms did not take them.  This report addresses all those arms EXCEPT mine, the NED cohort.

Safety, Efficacy, and Biomarkers of Nivolumab with Vaccine in Ipilimumab-Refractory or -Naive Melanoma.   Weber, et al.  Journal of Clinical Oncology.  December 1, 2013.

"We report the results of treatment of patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma who were ipilimumab naive (34 patients) or refractory (56 patients) and received nivolumab at 1, 3, or 10mg/kg.  Some patients also received an HLA-A 0201-restricted multipeptide vaccine."

"90 patients were enrolled at Moffitt Cancer Center between August 2010 and December 2012. 87 were evaluated for response, and three were too early for response evaluation. 74 patients had primary cutaneous melanoma. 8 had ocular mel. 8 had an unknown primary. 3 patients experienced progression on BRAF-i before enrollment.  10 had radiated brain mets. 5 patients in cohort 6 had untreated brain mets."

"Most common adverse event = fatigue. One patient experienced grade 3 bilateral optic neuritis, one had fevers, 2 others had pneumonitis...all resolved with steroids over 4 weeks to 4 months and discontinuation of treatment. Colitis was not seen in this trial.  Rashes were common, 1 required prednisone.  No treatment related deaths were observed."

"Median follow-up times were 20.3 months for patients in cohorts 1-3, 6.8 months for cohorts 4-6, and 8.1 months for all patients.  In ipi naive patients (n=34):  2 patients had a complete response, 6 had partial response, 7 had stable disease at 24 weeks, and 19 had progressive disease. Disease control rate = 45%.   In responders, median follow-up of 21.2 months, median duration of response was not reached.  In ipi refractory patients (n=53): 14 patients had partial response, 11 had stable disease at 24 weeks,  28 experienced progression.  Disease control rate = 47%.  In responders, median follow-up of 8.4 months, median duration of response was not reached.  For all 87 evaluable patients (ipi refractory and naive) the response rate was 25%, with a disease control rate of 46%.  Median duration of response was not reached at a median of 8.1 months.  PD-L1 tumor staining was associated with responses to Nivolumab, but negative staining did not rule out a response."

NOTE:  "12 of the 18 non-responders in cohorts 1-3 subsequently received ipi at 3mg/kg for a planned 4 doses. 2 patients had partial response.  2 had mixed response. 8 had progressive disease. 2 required steroids and infliximab for dose limiting colitis with ipi.  But, it demonstrates that patients who progress on Nivo can respond to ipi."

Hope that helps.  Wishing each of you my best. - c

Saturday, April 5, 2014

A life 'Les' Ordinary?????

After our last trip to Tampa and considering its hopeful implications....B said he hoped our lives would return to something a little more normal.  Well, of late...we have been in the normal repair business of life, especially after putting such things behind the back burner for the past couple of years.  I've already alluded to a new roof and septic tank repairs/draining...not that we personally did those things!  We finally had gutter guards installed so we no longer need hire the very strange folks who did that for us several years in a row, but whose work became so lackadaisical with ever increasing demolition of the surroundings that paying for the installation of the guards became cheaper!!!  Cracks in the wooden floor after a cold winter have been filled.  Baseboards and walls cracked by leaks BEFORE the roof repair have been mended and repainted...along with other baseboards and window sills.  Tubs recaulked.  Sink and tub drains replaced.  A leak in the plumbing upstairs was repaired with subsequent repair to the ceiling below it!!!  More painting. We tiled the area around and above our shower....yes, grouting became quite the adventure.  A new door and fixtures were installed in the shower....twice!!!  Areas under the dryer and washer have been cleaned with new hoses installed to the washer. {Sadly, just after the process, said washer is deceased with a new one to be delivered on Tuesday!!!} B has become quite the plumber!!! He ran a new line out to the back so that we can have a hose and faucet in a more convenient location.  All the unfinished pine furniture has been oiled.  The garage and 'playroom' have been cleaned with loads of flotsam carted off to Good Will and elsewhere. New work areas for my sewing and B's photography have been created. Curtains laundered. Clothes mended. Cars have been serviced. Drawers and cabinets cleaned. Roses and butterfly bushes pruned. So....now!!!  Spring seems to be on the way! In fact, Mr. Sneaky Snake appeared in my living room yesterday, slithering around on the welcome mat!!! At first worried that he was a cooperhead...he turned out to be a much mistaken ringneck who was tossed out the front door by a very brave Bentie!!!   I fear many plants like my Nandinas, rosemary, lavender and other rather hardy herbs have given up after the sub zero temperatures we had this past winter!!  So, a revamping of the herb bed and some other areas may soon be in order!!!

To a life a bit more ordinary???!   HA!  Silly, Bentie!  YOU LIVE WITH ME!!!!- c

Skirts made and shirt repaired in "new" sewing area!

A beautiful rose and forsythia with a new purple blouse, al la recent sewing extravaganza!

Tile in process with art as inspiration!

Finished product! 

Table that B built.  Now this is how you watch Spring arrive!!  To a LIFE 'LES' ORDINARY!